Nobody has ever tested it with the exception of Prof. P. N. Oak, who trusts the
entire world has been tricked. In his book TajMahal: The True Story, Oak says
theTaj Mahal isn't Queen Mumtaz's tomb yet an old Hindu sanctuary royal residence of
Master Shiva (at that point known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . Throughout his exploration Oak found that the Shiva sanctuary castle was usurped by Shah Jahan from that point Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own particular court account,
Badshahnama, Shah Jahan concedes that an outstandingly excellent fantastic house in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's entombment . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still
holds in his mystery gathering two requests from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Utilizing caught sanctuaries and houses, as an entombment put for dead squires and sovereignty was a typical practice among Muslim rulers.
For instance, Humayun, Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are altogether covered
in such houses. Oak's request started with the name of Taj Mahal. He says
the term " Mahal " has never been utilized for a working in any Muslim nations
from Afghanisthan to Algeria . "The irregular clarification that the term Taj
Mahal gets from Mumtaz Mahal was strange in atleast two regards.
Right off the bat, her name was never Mumtaz Mahalbut Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he composes.
Also, one can't overlook the initial three letters 'Mum' from a lady's
name to infer the rest of the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he
claims, is a degenerate form of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak
likewise says the romantic tale of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a children's story made by
court sycophants, botching history specialists and messy archeologists . Not a solitary imperial narrative of Shah Jahan's chance authenticates the romantic tale.
Moreover, Oak refers to a few archives recommending the Taj Mahal originates before
Shah Jahan's time, and was a sanctuary devoted to Shiva, adored by
Rajputs of Agra city. For instance, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a couple
tests from the riverside entryway of the Taj. Cell based dating tests uncovered
that the entryway was 300 years more established than Shah Jahan. European voyager Johan Albert Mandelslo, who went to Agra in 1638 (just seven years after Mumtaz's
passing), portrays the life of the city in his diaries. Yet, he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being fabricated. The works of Peter Mundy, an English guest to Agra inside a time of Mumtaz's passing, likewise recommend the
Taj was a vital building a long time before Shah Jahan's opportunity.
Prof. Oak calls attention to various outline and building irregularities that help the conviction of the Taj Mahal being an ordinary Hindu sanctuary as opposed to a sepulcher. Numerous rooms in the Taj Mahal have stayed fixed since Shah Jahan's opportunity are as yet difficult to reach to the general population .
Oak declares they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and different items
usually utilized for love ceremonies in Hindu sanctuaries . Dreading political kickback, Indira Gandhi's administration attempted to have Prof. Oak's book pulled back from the book shops, and debilitated the Indian distributer of the
first version critical results . There is just a single method to ruin or approve Oak's examination.
The ebb and flow government should open the fixed rooms of the Taj Mahal under
U.N. supervision, and let global specialists research.
On the off chance that we can open Sri Padmanabha Temple at Trivandrum why cant we open Taj Mahal?
entire world has been tricked. In his book TajMahal: The True Story, Oak says
theTaj Mahal isn't Queen Mumtaz's tomb yet an old Hindu sanctuary royal residence of
Master Shiva (at that point known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . Throughout his exploration Oak found that the Shiva sanctuary castle was usurped by Shah Jahan from that point Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own particular court account,
Badshahnama, Shah Jahan concedes that an outstandingly excellent fantastic house in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's entombment . The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still
holds in his mystery gathering two requests from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Utilizing caught sanctuaries and houses, as an entombment put for dead squires and sovereignty was a typical practice among Muslim rulers.
For instance, Humayun, Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are altogether covered
in such houses. Oak's request started with the name of Taj Mahal. He says
the term " Mahal " has never been utilized for a working in any Muslim nations
from Afghanisthan to Algeria . "The irregular clarification that the term Taj
Mahal gets from Mumtaz Mahal was strange in atleast two regards.
Right off the bat, her name was never Mumtaz Mahalbut Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he composes.
Also, one can't overlook the initial three letters 'Mum' from a lady's
name to infer the rest of the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he
claims, is a degenerate form of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak
likewise says the romantic tale of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a children's story made by
court sycophants, botching history specialists and messy archeologists . Not a solitary imperial narrative of Shah Jahan's chance authenticates the romantic tale.
Moreover, Oak refers to a few archives recommending the Taj Mahal originates before
Shah Jahan's time, and was a sanctuary devoted to Shiva, adored by
Rajputs of Agra city. For instance, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a couple
tests from the riverside entryway of the Taj. Cell based dating tests uncovered
that the entryway was 300 years more established than Shah Jahan. European voyager Johan Albert Mandelslo, who went to Agra in 1638 (just seven years after Mumtaz's
passing), portrays the life of the city in his diaries. Yet, he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being fabricated. The works of Peter Mundy, an English guest to Agra inside a time of Mumtaz's passing, likewise recommend the
Taj was a vital building a long time before Shah Jahan's opportunity.
Prof. Oak calls attention to various outline and building irregularities that help the conviction of the Taj Mahal being an ordinary Hindu sanctuary as opposed to a sepulcher. Numerous rooms in the Taj Mahal have stayed fixed since Shah Jahan's opportunity are as yet difficult to reach to the general population .
Oak declares they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and different items
usually utilized for love ceremonies in Hindu sanctuaries . Dreading political kickback, Indira Gandhi's administration attempted to have Prof. Oak's book pulled back from the book shops, and debilitated the Indian distributer of the
first version critical results . There is just a single method to ruin or approve Oak's examination.
The ebb and flow government should open the fixed rooms of the Taj Mahal under
U.N. supervision, and let global specialists research.
On the off chance that we can open Sri Padmanabha Temple at Trivandrum why cant we open Taj Mahal?
history is so full of surprises,secrets & mysteries. thanks for exploring one of them for us :) very interesting post!
ReplyDeleteThe article is really interesting,got a new information which we never had about Taj Mahal!!!
ReplyDeleteThere are many things in Indian history that has been manipulated by the rulers....
ReplyDelete